Airway Obstruction Caused by Sputa in Heat and Moisture Exchange Filter During Ventilation Using Supra-Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Case Report

0 Comments

Vol 7 | Issue 3 | September-December 2021 | Page: 07-09 | Naoya Kobayashi, Masanori Yamauchi

DOI: 10.13107/jaccr.2021.v07i03.184


Author: Naoya Kobayashi [1], Masanori Yamauchi [1]

 

[1] Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine. 2-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Naoya Kobayashi,
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine. 2-1
Seiryomachi, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan.
E-mail: dynamis_air@yahoo.co.jp


Airway Obstruction Caused by Sputa in Heat and Moisture Exchange Filter During Ventilation Using Supra-Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Case Report


Introduction: Supra-laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is widely accepted as an alternative to the tracheal tube. However, compared to the use of a tracheal tube, it may take longer to identify the many different causes of sudden respiratory distress. In particular, heat and moisture exchange filters are one of the most overlooked causes.
Case presentation: The case was that of a 76-year-old male Japanese patient (161.9 cm, 66.5 kg) who underwent an open renal biopsy. He presented with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with a Hugh–Jones dyspnea score of 2. The patient did not discontinue smoking prior to the operation. Anesthesia was induced using propofol (100 mg), fentanyl (100 μg), and remifentanil (0.3 μg/kg/min). I-gel™ #4 was inserted following neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium (40 mg). Anesthesia was maintained with 3–6% desflurane under positive pressure ventilation. After induction in the left lateral and jackknife positions, the following ventilator settings were used: volume-controlled ventilation with tidal volumes of 450 mL, respiratory rate of 12 breaths per minute, an inspiratory: expiratory ratio of 1:2, and a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. With these settings, the peak inspiratory pressure was 16 cmH2O. Five minutes after initiating the operation, the peak inspiratory pressure steadily increased to 30 cmH2O. Although we administered rocuronium, the peak inspiratory pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration increased over time. When we disconnected the heat and moisture exchange filter and LMA, we noticed a large quantity of sputa. A suction catheter was passed down the LMA and the sputa was removed, but the LMA was not obstructed. The peak inspiratory pressure continued to increase with tidal volumes of only 20–30 mL. Despite a normal external appearance of the heat and moisture exchange filter, we replaced it with a new one. The ability to ventilate improved immediately and the SpO2 recovered from 92% to 100%.
Conclusions: A heat and moisture exchange filter obstruction can be fatal during the usage of LMA. A combination of factors caused delays in the diagnosis.
Keywords: Airway obstruction, Heat and moisture exchange filter, Mechanical ventilation


References

1. Lee JR, Kim MS, Kim JT, Byon HJ, Park YH, Kim HS, et al. A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(6):606-11.
2. Beringer RM, Kelly F, Cook TM, Nolan J, Hardy R, Simpson T, et al. A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel() airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(12):1121-6.
3. Kim MS, Oh JT, Min JY, Lee KH, Lee JR. A randomised comparison of the i-gel and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in infants. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(4):362-7.
4. Kobayashi N, Wagatsuma T, Shiga T, Toyama H, Ejima Y, Yamauchi M. Age-related changes in factors associated with delayed extubation after general anesthesia: a retrospective study. JA Clin Rep. 2020;6(1):20.
5. Cavallone LF, Vannucci A. Review article: Extubation of the difficult airway and extubation failure. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(2):368-83.
6. Nandi PR, Charlesworth CH, Taylor SJ, Nunn JF, Dore CJ. Effect of general anaesthesia on the pharynx. Br J Anaesth. 1991;66(2):157-62.
7. Woo YC, Cha SM, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY, et al. Less perilaryngeal gas leakage with SLIPA than with LMA-ProSeal in paralyzed patients. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(1):48-54.
8. Lawes EG. Hidden hazards and dangers associated with the use of HME/filters in breathing circuits. Their effect on toxic metabolite production, pulse oximetry and airway resistance. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(2):249-64.
9. Stacey MR, Asai T, Wilkes A, Hodzovic I. Obstruction of a breathing system filter. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43(12):1276.
10. Reddy SC, Lim E. Unexpected airway obstruction due to oversaturation of a heat and moisture exchange filter. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017;45(2):274.
11. Kobayashi N, Ando K, Saito K, Toyama H, Fudeta H, Yamauchi M. Awake Nasotracheal Intubation for a 4-Year-old Boy with an Oral Penetrating Toothbrush Injury. Masui. 2015;64(9):981-4.
12. Kobayashi N, Shiga T, Ikumi S, Watanabe K, Murakami H, Yamauchi M. Semi-automated tracking of pain in critical care patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5229.


How to Cite this Article: Kobayashi N, Yamauchi M | Airway Obstruction Caused by Sputa in Heat and Moisture Exchange Filter During Ventilation Using Supra-Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Case Report | Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Case Reports | September- December 2021; 7(3): 07-09.

(Abstract Text HTML) (Download PDF)


Tags: , ,